It’s hard for us to believe it’s already 2021 and Angelina Jolie’s and Brad Pitt’s divorce is still not finalized.
According to Hello! Magazine, the actors exchanged vows at Chateau Miraval in France in 2014. magazine. According to TMZ, Jolie filed for divorce two years later, citing irreconcilable differences, a popular reason she sought to end her marriage with Pitt. Jolie filed for divorce, seeking full physical custody of the six children she and Pitt shared. She allowed Pitt to visit her only. Sources told TMZ at the time that Jolie was fed up with Pitt’s “consumption” of marijuana and alcohol. Sources also claimed that Jolie was not a fan of Pitt’s parenting style and had an anger problem. Jolie allegedly filed for divorce because of all these things.
Official court documents listed Jolie and Pitt’s separation on September 15, 2016; however, we are still fighting in court. This has been one the longest and most costly separations Hollywood has at any point seen. According to Daily Mail, Jolie and Pitt have spent $1 million on legal fees in the custody battle that is still raging. The custody battle could very well last until their youngest child turns 18, which won’t happen until 2027.
Continue reading to find out more about Pitt’s and Jolie’s complicated divorce.
The court proceedings of Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie of the Covid-19 pandemic
Angelina Jolie filed for divorce, TMZ reported that Brad Pitt was under investigation by the FBI for child abusing. However, the matter was settled a few minutes later. The FBI will not continue its investigation after a thorough review of the facts. According to the agency, no charges have been brought in this case. The divorce proceedings between Jolie and Pitt have been kept secret, however. Jolie, speaking out for the first time about her divorce proceedings from Pitt in 2017, told BBC News that it was “very difficult” to divorce Pitt. She said that many people find themselves in such a situation. My entire family has been through difficult times. My children, my children, are what I am focusing on. We will always be a family, and that is why I cope with it.”
It seemed like Jolie and Pitt would find common ground and settle their custody dispute, but things got more complicated. Jolie and Pitt were back in court in December 2020. Things were heating up again. According to Us Weekly, Pitt won a small victory by spending Christmas Eve with his children, but the custody battle would continue in 2021. Angelina and Brad are equally responsible for the endless drama. According to a source, the children of their parents are collateral damage.”
In May 2021, Brad Pitt won a small victory.
Brad Pitt received joint custody of five of his children along with Angelina Jolie in May 2021. The sixth child, however, is older than 18. Page Six was told by a source that the judge had made a “tentative” decision in favor of Pitt. Jolie has filed an appeal. Entertainment Tonight reports that on July 9, Pitt and Jolie’s attorneys were back in court. Robert Olson, Jolie’s legal advisor, mentioned that Judge John W. Ouderkirk be taken out from the case. Why Olson argued that the private judge was not impartial in the custody battle case, alleging that he was working on legal matters involving Pitt’s lawyer.” Until Ms. Jolie asked, what was going on was known to the judge,
Nicki Swift was keen to hear from an expert on why Pitt and Jolie are so difficult. We spoke to Brent Kaspar, a Marin County divorce attorney, to find out more. The case seems to be getting sticky because of the private judge. Find out Kaspar’s views on Judge Ouderkirk and his opinion on whether the private judge should be removed.
Are there any disadvantages to having a private judge?
Nicki Swift was told by Brent Kaspar, Attorney, that all relationships between judges must be disclosed, regardless of how far apart. Let’s suppose they belong to the same private tennis club that one of the parties is involved in, even though they have never met. To avoid bias, they should disclose that they are members of the same club. Kaspar stated that private judges are expected even to disclose more. “If you are financially motivated, you will want more cases. Your business depends on getting steady streams of cases from law firms. This is a Catch 22 situation for these guys. While they have the same obligation as public judges to disclose information, they also get paid differently. He explained that if you look at the money, it’s a reason to be concerned in trying to protect public from biases by the fact-finder.”
Private judging is based on the principle that if you run a successful law practice and your client needs a private judge, you will refer them to a former judge. If you want to be the best private judge in the country or a celebrity, you will go to one of the top law firms and have them referred to the judge. Is there bias? Maybe there is, but it’s possible that there isn’t. Kaspar stated that his business depends on obtaining cases from law firms.
Lawyer says that the judge in Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt’s custody case was ‘disgraceful.’
Brent Kaspar told Nicki Swift that Judge John W. Ouderkirk had “failed” because he did not “disclose” Brad Pitt’s lawyer information. As a judge, you are required to disclose any possible relationships. He stated that judges must be impartial and that the rules of judicial behavior are designed to keep any appearance of improper conduct from happening. Will Ouderkirk, the judge who appears to favor Pitt and give him joint physical custody of the children, be removed from the case? Kaspar said, “It’s difficult to say.”
Theodore Boutrous Pitt’s lawyer claims that Angelina Jolie knew all the facts from the beginning. “There were no surprises,” he added. “Ms. Jolie and her counsel knew about the relationship and the grounds.” Speaking to Entertainment Tonight Kelly Chang Rickert, Kelly Chang Rickert, a family law attorney, told Entertainment Tonight that Jolie would not be filing the appeal if the judge had sided against her. She said that she would not contest his biased ruling. She lost, so she is challenging it. Rickert said that she meant she is struggling, and she’s getting there.
The appeal is continuing, and Judge Ouderkirk continues to preside over the case.