Pitt and Jolie wed at the luxurious abode back in 2014 in a private ceremony attended only by their six children
Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie’s divorce was finalized in 2019. However, they are still at odds over the lavish French estate they co-own. Celebrity goos News obtained a court filing.
The Luxembourg complaint alleges that the 46-year-old “Maleficent star” tried to sell her 50% of the Chateau Miraval in Correns for $164million. Pitt, 57, was allegedly allowed to take over the Chateau Miraval.
According to court papers, Miraval is held by two limited liability corporations. Both parties own the property. Jolie was able to hold 40% through her company Nouvel.
The suit says that Nouvel [Jolie] has been slowing down the approval of annual accounts and the renewals of managers for Quimicum for four years.
ANGELINA JOLIE STATES THAT HER DECISION TO DIVORCE BRAD PITT WAS ‘LIGHTLY. ‘
“We are aware that Nouvel and Jolie have a real goal. To sell its stake in Chateau Miraval SA in a way that would circumvent Mondo Bongo’s right of first refusal (as provided in Quimicum’s articles of, as a result, This will result in a capital gain that Nouvel didn’t contribute to and Mondo Bongo investing.
Pitt and Jolie married at the residence in 2014 in a secret ceremony attended by only six of their children, Jolie. According to the documents, Pitt transferred 10% from his share to Jolie three years prior. This was a move that made them both 50/50 co-owners in the nine-figure landmark.
COURT DISQUALIFIES JUDGE ANGELINA JOLIE BRAD PITT’S DIVORCE CASE
Celebritygops News was informed Tuesday by sources that Jolie’s alleged dealings with the property are her attempt to change the rules and avoid Pitt’s obligations. According to reports, the two parties agreed to develop a common vision and insisted that there would be no return to war.
Jolie’s camp is accusing Pitt of using his celebrity to win sympathy in the ongoing custody battle with the exes.
Jolie’s attorneys stated to Page Six Tuesday that “this sort of gamesmanship is the last-ditch effort by a celebrity litigant who seeks special treatment.”
“There is nothing to see or review here. “There is no issue that meets or exceeds the Court’s stringent standards for review,” she counselled.
BRAD PITT FILES PERMITTED REVIEW IN CUSTODY BATTLE ANGELINA JOLIE AFTER DISQUALIFICATION DUTY JUDGE
After a private judge’s disqualificationJolie, Angelina Jolie filed for divorce in August 2016, citing “irreconcilable differences.” She requested primary custody of five of their six children: Pax, 17, Zahara, 16, Shiloh, 15, and twins Vivienne and Knox, 13. The former couple’s son Maddox is now 20 Earlier this month, Pitt filed for review in his custody battle after Jolie won with the disqualification of a private judge overseeing her case.
Pitt asked for a review in their custody battle after Jolie won with the disqualification of a private judge overseeing their case.
Theodore J. Boutrous Jr., Pitt’s attorney, stated in a statement to Celebrity gops News that the temporary judge had been repeatedly renewed by both parties and was now being disqualified. This came after a lengthy legal process, which included multiple witnesses and experts, and provided a detailed custodial decision.
“The lower court ruling will reward the parties who are losing child custody cases and condone their gambling skills, allowing them to wait and see the likely direction of the case before seeking disqualification from the judge. Accepting this strategic ‘lie in waiting’ disqualification challenge will cause irreparable damage to the parents and children involved in the case. This will unnecessarily prolong the resolution of these disputes in an already overloaded court. This kind of clever litigation strategy will cause parents to lose irreplaceable time with their kids as judges are often disqualified during their cases for minor reasons.
BRAD PITT WINS JOINT CUSTODY OF KIDS IN ANGELINA JOLIE DIVORCE CASE
The lower Court’s ruling is bad for children and bad for California’s overburdened judicial system,” Boutrous Jr. of Gibson, Dunn Crutcher LLP concluded.
Celebritygops News asked lawyers for Jolie for comment. However, Robert A. Olson (the actress’ attorney) stated in a statement that while they didn’t immediately respond to Celebritygops News’ request, he said that Robert A. Olson had told Entertainment Tonight that the Court of Appeal refused to tolerate the ethical violations of a private judge who heard custody issues and correctly vacated his orders.
“Mr Pitt’s attorney’s petition to the California Supreme Court shows just how much they cling to this private judge who was biased and refused the evidence. It is disturbing that in full knowledge of unethical behaviour and having previously failed to disclose their new and ongoing financial relationships with him, Mr Pitt’s counsel would seek to reinstate the private judge.
The statement concluded, “Ms Jolie hoped Mr Pitt would instead partner with her in focusing attention on the needs, voices, and healing of the children.”